The Dividing of Israel and Judah, Then and Now.

Last week, as I researched and read Scripture related to ‘stiffneckedness’ for a post, there were multiple connected trails that I chased.  Very interesting stuff…

I am not sure quite how I got into the passage leading to this post, however, the connection to ‘stiff necks’ is readily apparent.jeroboam ahias

We have discussed on various occasions the division of Israel and Judah, how they are often named ‘the House of Israel,’ and the ‘House of Judah’ in Scripture and how this has particular prophetic significance.  A GREAT primer, if the subject is new to you, is The Lost Sheep by 119 Ministries.  (They have a TON of terrific teachings…  all free!)

Now, we understand that the division was in the plan of Yahweh, though I think only in recent years have we begun to understand the hows and whys.  Today, as Yahweh reveals an understanding of things long hidden in Scripture, we find Him preparing Israel to be rejoined to Judah…  to the consternation of many, as this post will discuss.

What I want to share is what I read and pondered the other day.

Jeroboam, the first king of Israel (the Northern Ten Tribes), was very intentional in separating to himself the Northern Kingdom.  He had a kingdom and he wanted to insure that He and his progeny kept it!  I mean, who wants to go back to normal life when you can build a dynasty?

Let’s read and then discuss and compare:

25 Then Jeroboam built Shechem in the hill country of Ephraim, and lived [a]there. And he went out from there and built Penuel. 26 Jeroboam said in his heart, “Now the kingdom will return to the house of David. 27 If this people go up to offer sacrifices in the house of the Lord at Jerusalem, then the heart of this people will return to their lord, even to Rehoboam king of Judah; and they will kill me and return to Rehoboam king of Judah.” 28 So the king [b]consulted, and made two golden calves, and he said to them, “It is too much for you to go up to Jerusalem; behold your gods, O Israel, that brought you up from the land of Egypt.” 29 He set one in Bethel, and the other he put in Dan. 30 Now this thing became a sin, for the people went to worship before the one as far as Dan. 31 And he made houses on high places, and made priests from among [c]all the people who were not of the sons of Levi. 32 Jeroboam [d]instituted a feast in the eighth month on the fifteenth day of the month, like the feast which is in Judah, and he [e]went up to the altar; thus he did in Bethel, sacrificing to the calves which he had made. And he stationed in Bethel the priests of the high places which he had made. 33 Then he [f]went up to the altar which he had made in Bethel on the fifteenth day in the eighth month, even in the month which he had [g]devised [h]in his own heart; and he [i]instituted a feast for the sons of Israel and [j]went up to the altar to burn [k]incense.  1 Kings 12:25-33

WOW!!  That passage just boggles the mind!  And, it begins a pattern of behavior that continues to this very day.

Scripture is clear.  The reason Jeroboam did what he did was to drive a wedge between Israel and Judah, to create division between the people and Jerusalem, the dwelling place of Yahweh.  He did so with several very specific measures.  He…

  • redefined their God.
  • redefined their worship.
  • established a system of priests.
  • instituted new holy days (holidays).
  • syncretized paganism into the religious system.

This is a calculated transgression against Yahweh, and against His Torah.  The gravity is breath-taking in its coldness!  This is a major milestone in the House of Israel’s rejection of Yahweh and HIS ways, His voice, His commandments, His Torah, etc…

That rejection continues to this very day!

Predictably, so does the sin of Jeroboam.

An honest ramble through ‘church’ history, particularly if you look through the unapproved, unsanitized history, you will find that at numerous points in history, especially in the late 2nd to 5th centuries, Christendom’s Greco-Roman Bishops were very intentional in dividing the restored Tent of David that the Apostles began rebuilding.  (The Amos quote has an early partial fulfillment, but we see that it is pointed to the end of days.)

Late last month, I posted ‘What did the Early Church Fathers REALLY do?‘  I HIGHLY recommend you take the time to watch and absorb, because that information is NOT promoted by most pulpits as it would reveal the very thing we discuss…  that is, the intentional dividing of the Body… Or, this webpage with an overview of errant understanding and wrong historical perspective.

To take a very quick overview of Christendom, let’s consider a few things our ‘fathers’ have done.  They,

  • redefined God.  Torah-keeping Yeshua became Torah-abolishing Jesus.  (Some suppose to tap dance around this charge by stating that the ‘principles’ still apply, but ‘we don’t have to do that.’)
  • redefined worship by removing a number of things tied directly to the Hebrew roots of the Messiah and the faith.
  • established a system of priests that operated according to their own doctrines and thought processes.  All Hebraic perspectives and contextual clues were removed, ignored or denigrated.
  • instituted new holy, er, holidays, such as Christmas, Lent, Easter, etc, and erased, denigrated, ignored, etc the Feasts of Yahweh that were tied to the Creation Order and the sanctifying will of the Father.
  • syncretized paganism into their new religious system with a myriad of false practices.

No doubt, some pastor reading this is now holding his head in his hands and thinks I have completely lost my mind.  Rest assured, I have done the research and I make NO excuses for the errors I walked in while occupying a pulpit for a decade.

Yes, there are true believers saved in the name of Jesus, but there is also truth coming out all over and we have a choice to make.  Learn, repent and humbly correct our errors in order to prepare for THE Kingdom, or move forward with stiff necks and hard hearts protecting our reputation and little kingdoms.  Once we have been informed, we have to do something about it, or we walk in willful sin.

Jeroboam chose the latter and Scripture records that Abba Yahweh warned him.  This is what happened,

33 After this event Jeroboam did not return from his evil way, but again he made priests of the high places from among [a]all the people; any who would, he ordained, to be priests of the high places. 34 [b]This event became sin to the house of Jeroboam, even to blot it out and destroy it from off the face of the earth. 1 Kings 13:33-34

In the last decade, at an accelerating pace, the Ruach/Spirit has been awakening people to the ancient paths.  We are being awakened to the huge amount of tradition and pagan myth we have allowed into our worship, and we are, most importantly, awakening to the historical fact of the intentional dividing of Judah and Gentile believers in Messiah.  In the wake of this growing tidal wave of search for truth and a restoration of first century practice, there is also a growing number of pastors who, when faced with this information, choose the path of Jeroboam.

Truly sad, but even sadder are the words of Messiah Yeshua,

21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father who is in heaven will enter. 22 Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many [a]miracles?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness.Matthew 7:21-23

Notice the distinction between ‘the will of My Father’ and ‘lawlessness.’  Even a simple reading of the Tanak indicates that ‘the will of My Father’ is to ‘obey My voice,’ ‘walk in My paths,’ ‘keep My commandments,’ etc.  and of course, ‘lawlessness’ is rejecting the Torah.

We are at a pivotal point in history as we enter the seventh millennium.  Our Father is at the point of bringing His people together to again walk in His ways and follow the Messiah as we enter through His redemptive blood.  We dare not stand in His way by dividing Israel and Judah.  Rather, we best be seeking Him in humility and asking how we can be of service!

I know this is challenging for some.  Humility and prayer is the answer.



If this post has challenged or blessed you, please consider sharing it!

About Pete Rambo

Details in 'About' page @ Basically, husband of one, father of four. Pastor x 11 years, former business and military background. Micro-farmer. Messianic believer in Yeshua haMashiach!
This entry was posted in Deeper Study and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to The Dividing of Israel and Judah, Then and Now.

  1. hisloammi says:

    I was just reading Esdras this morning, and noted the stiffnecked connection to the ‘not doing commands’ and then looked it up in Nehemiah. These were my same ponderings. Excellent comparison Rambo


  2. hisloammi says:

    Esdras 1 chapter 1 near the end, and Nehemiah 9:16. May be able to find Esdras online, or I may have an extra copy in my bookstash you can borrow


  3. Pingback: The Sin of Israel and Modern Christendom | natsab

  4. ברוס says:

    I would encourage you to re-examine your list. Your, bullets in the first section were basically spot on give or take.

    You’ve appeared to have in completed the task of the christianities fathers (for clarification anyone who views jesus as lord and savior is a christian, no matter what your group titling is)

    I would say the following as bullets:

    Redefined G-d: Yes because this idea that the G-d of Israel becomes a man or has a “son” from a Jewish woman is an entirely foreign concept and is forbidden in the Torah. The Jewish Bible never speaks to such things. The christian bible (new testament) is the creator of these unproven ideas. And the church fathers are the canonizer of the christian bible.

    Redefined Worship: Paul is the leader of this redefinition. He takes the Jewish bible and tampers with many of the passages to promote these new ideas of the Messiah to the Gentiles of his day. Ie: Deuteronomy 30:14 to Romans 10:8 (the many insertions and clipping off parts of what was said in Deut 30:14 is quite outstanding and gives an entirely deviation and opposite interpretation of what Moses was saying)

    Your remaining bullets in the second part vary based on different christian sect your referring to.

    Mainstream christianity does it own thing and they read jesus into almost every passage in the Jewish Bible to justify amoungst themselves there practice.

    Sub christian groups like Messianic Judaism and Hebrew Roots though they realize the feast of G-d and Torah aren’t done away with they still suffer from there older christian mainstream brothers and sisters as they too “see” jesus in many things related to the Torah/Tanach. Their justification is a borderline replacement mindset “until the fullness of the Gentiles has come” again another christian bible concept that has no root in the Jewish Bible.

    The thing that appears to to be missing in christianity is critical thinking and context. If one just examines the Messianics prophecies related to jesus christians say “speak” of him in context you’ll see it can’t be discussing jesus.

    As I mentioned Deut 30:14 compared to Romans 10:8 (which Paul is telling/ taking advantage of these unlearned gentiles) is a prime example amoung many of how the christian bible (new testament) misquotes or adds to or takes away from the Jewish Bible (Tanach or christian term “Old testament”)


    • Pete Rambo says:


      Thank you for interacting. I appreciate and value that.

      Certainly, there is much we can agree on!! The Path of Righteousness before the G-d of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob is Torah. In that regard, Christianity has cast aside something of inestimable value. I would agree, too that the Mashiach is coming to rebuild the Tent of David and to rule from Zion as he will magnify the Torah. Exactly how it all plays out… I am learning/relearning much as I re-evaluate the traditions of my fathers. So, your thoughts are appreciated.

      I would be interested in your honest thoughts on this video: Virgin Birth Exposed

      Thank you for taking the time, Shalom!


      • ברוס says:

        “The first one to present there case seems right, until his fellow comes and cross examines him”-Mishlei 18:17

        At the 3:25ish mark he mentions that he’s found 5-6 references of Jewish literature that speak about the coming of the Messiah will be first recognized by the nations and it will be a by a star (ie:astrology).

        I would obviously challenge that but if I were the host I would ask he cite those references making these claims. And if you notice he doesn’t cite his “Jewish literature”.

        It’s also very funny that I’ve seen a pattern among christian sects and that’s this desire to know the Targums or to quote them. As the gentleman mentions in the 6:45-7:00 mark. It’s very disrespectful to the audience when you mention phrases like “Targum” and never explain to them that it’s not Hebrew but Aramaic as the document and the Targums served as a “poor mans” or “unlearned mans” translation of the Jewish Bible. Since most of these individuals didn’t know hebrew because of various circumstances. (extra educational material for anyone reading)

        Then he gets into Jewish Hermeneutics (does a poor job) … Oy … Is he Jewish btw?

        At the 24:00 min mark, he has the audacity to say the Torah clearly lays out a pattern that culminates with the virgin birth of messiah jesus. (Again he doesn’t cite references) but it’s amazing to hear the hostess just eat it all up in amazement lol .

        Not to mention Almah means young woman NOT virgin. Betulah is virgin.

        And this blatant manipulation of the Jewish Bible to promote jesus is absurd in this video. Has anyone really examined the text from a contextual side without biased eyes to really see if Isaiah was pointing to jesus? Not to mention jesus is never named Immanuel lol

        In all honesty if you read chapter 7-8 of Isaiah you would have came to the conclusion that it’s either about the prophet Isaiah’s wife or King Ahaz wife (I lean towards King Ahaz).

        But ask yourself this, how is a virgin birth (if that was the case) Again it’s not. But if it was how is a virgin birth a sign to the Nation of Israel during that day in how they would recognize the Messiah? I mean is Mary really that immodest to go around sharing such intimate things? Or does she have a certificate by her OBGYN on her wrist and everyone knows this is a virgin woman about to birth the Messiah?

        Also have you ever asked why didn’t your god jesus say that this was a sign of him coming, when the people asked him for a sign? Why didn’t he say “Hey guys remember my mom was a virgin when she had me, like duh”. C’mon

        Are you that invested in jesus and not the G-d of Israel to really examine Isaiah to see if that even points to jesus?


      • ברוס says:

        Also view my post as an encouragement to not play defense attorney to jesus but become that of a judge. Meaning this; that a judge hears and EXAMINES both sides of the position before making a verdict.

        Re-open the hearing on if jesus was/is really is the Jewish messiah. We don’t reject him cause of Pauls words lol (I know he’s got many christians believing we’re lost or blind or scales on our eyes) he’s rejected because the Tanach doesn’t point to him [jesus] …. Remember Context Context Context 🙂 …. G-ds word is clear and consistent in showing the Real Messiah.


  5. Pingback: Two Types of Watchmen… | natsab

  6. Pingback: Important preparation for the wilderness… | natsab

  7. Pingback: The Church Lied to Me!! | natsab

Please Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s