Thought it would be fun to post a pop quiz… I have a couple more topics in the wings.
I’m going to put up 10 questions and then the answers at the very end. DO NOT scroll to the bottom unless you want the answers. Try to answer first, then scroll. Leave a comment on how you did and what surprised you…
1. When did the Apostle Paul stop being a Pharisee?
2. When was Saul’s name changed to Paul?
3. What was the new religion Paul was teaching? (I.e. how did he refer to himself?)
4. Did Paul offer sacrifices in the temple after his Damascus road vision?
5. After his Damascus road vision, did Paul continue to keep the Law?
6. What day of the week did Paul consistently teach and preach on?
7. Did Paul think the Law was an authoritative guide to Christian living?
8. Did Paul keep and recommend keeping the Feasts?
9. Did Paul teach that believing Gentiles replace Israel?
10. Is Paul hard to understand?
(Short answer is in bold. The rest is a longer explanation where necessary.)
1. Paul never stopped being a Pharisee. While there were many branches (denominations?) of Pharisees, the general term refers to learned men who took a very literal (Sola Scriptura?) approach to the ancient Scriptures. Paul was of the House of Gamaliel and by his own testimony, never stopped being a Pharisees. Acts 23:6ff, “Brethren, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees…” Jesus/Yeshua dressed down many Pharisees for adding to the law, but He never said that being a Pharisees was a sin. In fact, at points, He praised their righteousness.
A favorite blog has a current series exploring Paul from a Biblical and Hebrew context. She reveals much that is contrary to ‘tradition.’ See the third part in the series as it speaks directly to Rav Shaul/Apostle Paul’s status as a Pharisees.
2. Trick question that assumes his name was changed. In fact, Saul/Paul had dual citizenship and used his Hebrew name when in Jerusalem or on court business. Later, as his ministry was more to Gentiles or into Gentile regions, he relied much more on the Roman name he had had since birth. We see the transition in Luke’s writings at Acts 13:9. So, in short, Saul’s name was never changed to Paul.
3. Again, trick question, Paul, by his own testimony was NOT converted to anything. He called himself a follower of ‘the Way‘ which other Jews called a ‘sect.’ In short, both Paul and the Jews believed he was still a Jew… He just believed Yeshua was the promised Messiah.
4. Yes. By his own testimony, “…after several years I came to bring alms to my nation and to present offerings…” Here he is recounting for Governor Felix the events of Acts 21:20-26 wherein James advised him to pay for four men to join him (Paul) in Nazarite vows of purification in the Temple to prove that he (Paul) “… walked orderly, keeping the Law.” Further, Hebrews 8:4, written decades after Messiah’s death and resurrection, states that sacrifices in the Temple were being offered Lawfully. And, Ezekiel 44 details some types of future blood sacrifices in the new Temple… I hardly believe the last five chapters of Ezekiel are all figurative. Certainly, this challenges the traditional Christian doctrines I was raised with.
5. Yes!! Paul kept the Law. See Acts 21:20-26; 24:14-17; 25:7-8, 11; 28:17-18.
6. The Sabbath. There are dozens of verses in Acts that point to this fact. In fact, there is not a single verse in the entire Bible pointing to preaching on any day BUT the Sabbath. You may ask about Acts 20:7, so let’s take a look at that verse.
On the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread, Paul began talking to them, intending to leave the next day, and he prolonged his message until midnight.
First, the phrase ‘first day of the week’ is the following in the Greek manuscript: μια των σαββατων or, transliterated, ‘mia ton sabbaton.’ That might answer your question right there without going any farther. The literal translation is ‘one of the sabbaths.’ I kid you not, there is NO equivalent of this phrase anywhere in Greek literature that means ‘first day of the week.’
In fact, the phrase only appears nine time in all of Greek literature. Seven appear in the Gospels, once here and in 1 Corinthians 16:2. All references are in relation to the Feast of First fruits and the counting of the omer. Every one. All point to ‘one of the Sabbaths.’ See Acts 20:6 and 16 and 1 Corinthians 16:2 & 8 to demonstrate that every occurrence in Scripture is related to counting the seven Sabbaths after Passover. NO reference in Scripture EVER points to Sunday. A detailed study is available here.
So, back to the verse I quoted, our Western Greek mind tries to make this event happen on Sunday night when in fact, it occurred Saturday evening after the weekly Sabbath worship and a shared meal when Rav Shaul gets cranked up teaching some more and talks late into the night.
A further study into Constantine reveals that he, in 325 a.d., outlawed Sabbath worship as well as feasts and anything else Jewish among Christians on pain of death. This, then, begs the question. What were Christians, as late as 325 a.d. doing worshiping on the Sabbath and celebrating the feasts if the Law had been done away with?? One source.
7. Yes! Avram Yehoshua, in The Lifting of the Veil, pg 6, quotes Christian scholar David Williams saying ‘for Paul, the Law remained the authoritative guide to Christian living.’ Quote taken from New International Biblical Commentary: Acts, p. 261. Yehoshua further cites the following passages: Romans 3:31; 7:7, 12, 14; 1st Corinthians 7:19. I would add 1 Corinthians 11:1 in light of 1 John 2:3-6.
8. Yes!! We see Paul celebrating Passover/Unleavened Bread and Pentecost in Acts 20:6 & 16. Further, he commands keeping the Feast of Passover in I Corinthians 5:8.
9. Absolutely NOT!! In fact, he taught that believing Gentiles are grafted INTO and become a part of the commonwealth of Israel. As such, that means the Father’s expectations of both Jew and grafted-in Gentile are the same….
10. Actually, the Apostle Peter indeed says,
14 So then, dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless and at peace with him. 15 Bear in mind that our Lord’s patience means salvation, just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that God gave him. 16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
17 Therefore, dear friends, since you have been forewarned, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of the lawless and fall from your secure position.
Peter specifically warns against Paul being twisted into the error of Lawlessness!!! Ever heard Law versus Grace? Yep… Paul gets twisted by ignorant and unprincipled men in order to produce a lawless grace only gospel.
If any of these questions have challenged your perspective of Paul and you want to learn more about what the Scriptures really say, I recommend the Pauline Paradox Series by 119 Ministries.
I pray this pop quiz has blessed you. Be sure to test everything against Scripture!
I know you know most of these answers… Any surprises? Or, fresh thoughts?
This might be a fun exercise on some other topics, too. Drop me an email if you have some good ideas for questions.
this was like soooo easy!
I was especially glad u put the sacrifices it in there bc it comes across as quite a shocker to most. It really does mess with our former doctrines. I have these quizzy things run through my mind all day…will work on a list-haha. May add why the Saturday night thing matters bc to our Greco minds at still qualifies as Saturday rather than Sabbath ending at sunset bc our minds count sun up to sundown rather than sundown to sundown for a day. Also like the sola scriptura note bc sola scriptura seems to have turned out notsosola scriptura…plus who doesn’t like some good Bible trivia!!?
Here’s another good quiz I like to make folks think who are we really following if we are to walk as He walked: http://lexmeyer.com/quiz-jesus-or-constantine/. You could also do a popquiz of wo what when where on the ‘new covenant’ as in our discussion last Shabbat!
Hi Pete, thanks for the ping back and great idea about the quiz, nicely done.
As hisloammi said, some of these things really mess with your doctrines at times. But thankfully God is patient and willing to allow the honest searching heart the room to grow.
Pingback: More on ‘Follow me Paul.’ | natsab
Pingback: Know Your Bible? 10 Question Pop Quiz. (Subject: General) | natsab
Pingback: The Apostle Paul was NOT a Christian! | natsab
Pingback: Steven Anderson – Exposed Pt. 9 | natsab
Pingback: Happy Anniversary!! We are one year old today! | natsab
Pingback: I can’t hear what you SAY, I watch what you DO! | natsab
That was easy for me, but then I have been teaching this stuff for years.
Yeah, once you ‘see’ it, it makes so much sense and is easy… I was ‘blind’ until a couple years ago…
Pingback: Eu não consigo ouvir o que você DIZ, eu vejo o que você FAZ! | um só corpo, uma só fé
Um paul doesnt support the keeping of feasts. The bible actually says not to and so does paul says that in Colossians 2:16- 17 😊
Welcome. I encourage you read more of the blog and wrestle with the traditions we have inherited.
Paul indeed does tell us to keep the feasts: I Corinthians 5:7-8, in a clear reference to Passover, an ordinance that Exodus 12:14 & 24 tell us is ‘forever,’ tells us:
A simple reading of Colossians 2 reveals that Paul is addressing those of the gnostic heresy who were trying to keep new believers from celebrating the feasts. Notice what the false teachings are that Paul is addressing: v.8 ‘philosophy, vain deceit,..traditions of men.. elementary principles of the world.’ Further, in v. 18 and following he continues the list with ‘abasement, worship of angels, …elementary principles, decrees (dogma: always used to refer to the rules of men, never of the Law of God), etc…’ NONE of those words are ever used as descriptors of the perfect Law of God.
What Paul says in vss 16 & 17 is that no man is to act as your judge but the Body of Messiah. At that time, the Body of Messiah was ‘zealous for the Torah’ (see Acts 21:20) and understood what it meant to ‘walk as He walked.’ (See I jn 2:3-6) Paul further tells us in Colossians 2:17 that the feasts are a shadow of what is to come, therefore, those are unfulfilled!
Here is averse you may want to look at: 2 Peter 3:14-17. Peter tells us that a) Paul is hard to understand, b) misunderstanding Paul leads to lawlessness, and c) those unlearned/untaught in the Torah easily twist him. Therefore, if your understanding of Paul leads you toward lawlessness, then you are likely misunderstanding him.
I have written many pieces here revealing the historic antiSemitism of the Church and the resultant separation of believers in Messiah from the very Jewish Messiah and His root. Please take the time to read and dare to be challenged.
Shalom in Yeshua.
Pingback: R. C. Sproul, Jr., is only partly right… | natsab