Assumptions, Biases and Misdirection. IVPNT: Acts Pt. 6

If it wasn’t so sad, it would be funny.  Some of the assumptions and biases in Dr. William J. Larkin’s IVP New Testament Commentary on Acts are so obvious and contrary to Blind Leading the BlindScripture that it reveals the degree of ‘traditions of men’ we have in Churchianity.  Some of this bias we have seen in our previous posts, but today we’ll try to identify language geared toward steering the reader in a prejudicial manner.

        The Blind Leading the Blind

This first example is so wildly misleading that I am ashamed to reveal that Dr. Larkin is an emeritus professor of Biblical Greek.  Here is what he says, concerning Acts 20:6,

As Paul is about to set out on the last leg of his journey to Jerusalem…He divides his party, sending some—the Asians Tychichus and Trophimus—or possibly all his companions ahead to Troas by ship. After celebrating Christian Easter in Philippi (Passover A.D. 57 was April 7-14) and a five-day sea journey against contrary winds……

Are you kidding me??  The Greek, over which Larkin is supposed to have mastery, clearly says,

…ἡμέρας τῶν ἀζύμων…  [days of unleavened (bread)]

WOW!!  Not just biased, but outright changing the Word of God!  Lest I really get derailed by this blatant bias, I’ll move along.

Less than five sentences later he says, concerning Acts 20:7,

At the end of a week’s stay in Troas, Paul continues his ministry of encouragement in the context of a worship service. In the earliest unambiguous reference to early church practice concerning Sunday worship, Luke tells us that on the first day of the week we came together to break bread (compare 1 Cor 16:2; Rev 1:10; Didache 14:1; Epistle of Barnabas 15:9).

Another complete fail!  The Greek for Acts 20:7 says,

μιᾷ τῶν σαββάτων…  

a phrase we took a really good look at earlier.  It means, ‘one of the sabbaths.’  Christendom tries to make it mean something else, but multiple proofs demonstrate the failure.  Larkin’s multiple cites, with the exception of 1 Cor. 16:2, all say ‘the Lord’s day,’ which proves nothing.  Yeshua said, ‘the Son of Man is the Lord of the Sabbath,‘ which would make the Sabbath, the Lord’s day!

I find the statement ‘unambiguous reference’ to be utterly laughable.  Even more comedic when we read further in his commentary on this passage and he has to admit,

Hence although the first day of the week was a workday, Christians hallowed it at its beginning and end,

Yeah…  So let me get this straight.  They changed the Sabbath to Sunday and continued with it being a workday…  Again!  Complete fail.  No need to address this mockery further.

Continuing with the next section of Larkin’s commentary,

Paul consciously bypasses Ephesus, and Luke tells us why: he does not want to be slowed down on his way to Jerusalem, for he desires to arrive there, if possible, by the day of Pentecost. Though Jewish piety may motivate him (see Deut 16:16), a celebration of the Spirit’s outpouring on the first Christian Pentecost is certainly reason enough (Acts 2:1-13). Still, Paul’s pastor’s heart overcomes his personal schedule. He cannot do without one last contact with the church in Asia. With earnestness and authority he summons the elders from Ephesus, thirty-odd miles away.

Wow!  The text clearly tells us Paul’s motivation is Pentecost, or rightly, Shavuot.  Larkin can’t help but twist the facts by

  • denigrating Paul’s Torah obedience and turning feast observance into ‘Jewish piety,’
  • forcing on us a ‘Christian Pentecost!’

Radical antisemitic/antiTorah assumption that just makes me shake my head.  Very sad!  No wonder Christendumb is so messed up!  This is what a conservative New Testament scholar teaches!  Hate to read the liberals!

Next up, a quote from his commentary on Acts 21:17ff,

In the midst of some Jews’ death-dealing intentions counterbalanced by Roman protective justice stands the Christian witness Paul. He shows that rare combination of loyalty to his ethnic traditions (that’s what gets him into trouble in the first place) and boldness to seize every opportunity to proclaim the universal gospel.

Death dealing Jews and protective Romans!  Christian Paul!  And, what gets him in trouble is loyalty to ethnic traditions??

Oh, my aching head!  The breathed Word of God, the Torah is just…  ethnic traditions!

Maybe Larkin needs to read The Apostle Paul was NOT a Christian!

Here’s another bold assumption,

The key role Ananias played in Paul’s conversion demonstrates to the audience that being a pious Jew and being a Christian convert are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

Larkin’s bias is on full display here.  There is ZERO evidence that any Jews ‘converted’ to anything!  Most certainly, they did not turn to some other religion!  They found and believed in the Hope of Israel!  Ananias was a Torah observant Jew who believed in Yeshua haMashiach.  And, lost on Christendom, is the fact that Yahweh works miracles through Torah observant Jews!  (Come to think of it, is there a single example in all of Scripture of a miracle being worked through someone who was NOT Torah observant?  I’ll have to think on that, because nothing comes to mind…)

There are more biases, assumptions and misdirections throughout this commentary, but that is the mainstay of most of Christendom.  I think I’ll stop here.  The point is that much of what Christians believe needs to be re-evaluated through the light of Scripture and NOT through false presuppositions, bias, prejudice and doctrines of men.  Much of what we have been taught is rooted in falsehood.

In closing the series, I am reminded of a conversation I had with a young pastor about 18 months ago.  He told me I needed to read more ‘church fathers’ to clear up my misunderstandings.  I guess he rightly understood that I was not inculcated enough with the party line…  too prone to ‘free-thinking.’

Today, I am a Free Thinker!  I’m free of false doctrines and antisemitic church fathers and I can think clearly as I approach passages…  The freedom and thinking grows with each passing day!  HalleluYah!


About Pete Rambo

Details in 'About' page @ Basically, husband of one, father of four. Pastor x 11 years, former business and military background. Micro-farmer. Messianic believer in Yeshua haMashiach!
This entry was posted in Debate/Discussion and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Assumptions, Biases and Misdirection. IVPNT: Acts Pt. 6

  1. Now the question arises in my mind what translations of the bible have considered this man’s work? Has the NIV been based upon some of this man’s work? The NIV is deception. This man’s work is flat out deception. Is Larkin a member of a secret society, such as a Freemason? The 33degree Fremason knows who the “architech of the universe” is. And I will offer a hint here, it is not the Creator of the Universe, GOD Almighty, Yhwh ( to be clear). Is this man a Jesuit? Is this man a closet Catholic deeply affiliated with the papacy?


    • Pete Rambo says:

      I don’t think he is any of those things. The commentary wasn’t published until around 1996 or 8. Obviously, it can be used by others going forward, but what he writes is an example of the larger sentiment in Christendom.

      I agree that there are plenty of wolves who are closet connectors with various organizations… I can’t speak for him in that regard, but I seriously doubt it… Just my opinion.

      Avoid speculation that may lead to lashon hara. 😉


  2. Jack Jackson says:

    Remember that Paul warns in Acts 20 (even in tears) that things will turn to apostasy as soon as he goes away (dies). Christianity is looking for the great apostasy to come; rather than looking in their rear view mirror. To look to the church fathers sometimes leads right into that apostasy, though many clearly still kept Sabbath and Passover etc.

    As for Dr. Larkin and so many others like him, they need to come to grips that many of them are either deceived, or deceivers. In vain they do worship me teaching for doctrine the commandments of men.


Please Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s