Bilateral Ecclesiology. Antisemitism…. In Reverse?

A book I read recently hit a nerve.  Frankly, I didn’t realize it was such a sore spot until that moment.

More than a few times in the last couple months, I have run into a theological debate/discussion about ecclesiology.  Specifically, Bilateral Ecclesiology.  Now, before you run for the exit, let me explain what the words mean and why it is important to understand.

In theological terms, the study of the ‘church,’ is called ‘ecclesiology, from the Greek word ‘ekklesia.’  ‘Bilateral,’ of course, means ‘two parts, two sides, two parties…’  So, Bilateral Ecclesiology is the coined term for those who believe the ‘ekklesia,’ in this use meaning the ‘Bride/Body of Messiah,’ has two parts.

The place this has really sprung to the forefront is in Messianic circles and the discussion/debate over who fits where.  While we should be investing time on more important issues and studies, we are busy wrestling with turf boundaries.  Let me explain.

Rav Shaul, the apostle Paul, wrote in Ephesians 2,

…in Christ Jesus you who formerly were far off [a]have been brought near [b]by the blood of Christ. 14 For He Himself is our peace, who made both groups into one and broke down the [c]barrier of the dividing wall, 15 [d]by abolishing in His flesh the enmity, which is the Law of commandments contained in ordinances, so that in Himself He might [e]make the two into one new man, thus establishing peace, 16 and might reconcile them both in one body to God through the cross, [f]by it having put to death the enmity.  (Ephesians 2:13-16)

He articulates that in Messiah Yeshua, the barrier dividing ‘those who were far off’ and those who were near has been broken down!  Messiah’s plan, purpose and desire is ONE new man, ONE body!!

Soon after the death of the apostles, both Jew and Gentile set out to rebuild this wall.  Judaism went this way and Christianity went that way…  Rabbis and theologians were intentional in driving wedges between the two groups.  Jews defined themselves by who they did NOT believe in… Yeshu, and Christians, by a “torahless” Messiah.

Much error and sin resulted on both parts with Churchianity being the major sinner in persecutions and pogroms against brother Judah.  Oh, haSatan must be delighted!

What was it the Mashiach said about a ‘house dived against itself…?’

Fast forward to today and we get to reap the bitter waters of our fathers.

The last couple decades, particularly with the advent of the internet and the ease of communication and access to information, has led to a growing movement of believers who have recognized that Scripture calls for a faith in Messiah that leads to obedience to all of His commandments.  This group, composed of Torahkeeping Jews who have found Yeshua and Messiah-loving Gentiles who have found Torah, have become an affront to that wall of separation!!

Interestingly, Christianity is so large, that this movement of some adherents toward keeping the feasts and worshiping on the Sabbath, according to the commandments, has not really rocked the boat until very recently.

On the other hand, parts of the much much smaller Judaism group have been threatened for some time by this move toward the ‘middle’ by both Jews and Gentiles,

who keep the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus.  (Rev. 12:17 & 14:12)

Heaven forbid the nations fall in love with and begin to follow the instructions God gave at Mt. Sinai and before.

So, about ten years ago, particularly among some Messianic Jews, those who are of Jewish decent and ‘practice’ who believe in Messiah, a theological position began to be asserted called ‘Bilateral Ecclesiology,’ or BE, for short.  The main assertion was/is that Gentile believers in Yeshua don’t have to keep Torah…  In fact, they prefer we NOT keep Torah…  “That was just for the Jews,” they say.  Sometimes, the really bold proponents will say, “we are the chosen people and (implying the listener) the Gentile will live in the nations around Israel and come pay homage and taxes from year to year (to us)….”  Ouch!

Of course, all of this BE ‘position’ is couched in Scripture references that support the case, while ignoring clear passages that disassemble it.

Now, lest I be misunderstood, let me be crystal clear!!  Israel, and thus Judah, has NOT been replaced, superseded, forgotten, abandoned or anything of the like.  God’s promises are without repentance!  The Jews are STILL and always will be God’s people…  But, those purchased by the blood of Mashiach are grafted in and are members of the commonwealth of Israel and also recipients, by faith, of the promises to the fathers.

The whole BE theological position leads to more division, and as blogger Judah Gabriel Himango says, “exclusion, racism and feelings of inferiority.”  (I love his treatment of Bilateral Ecclesiology.  Revealing, from a brother who is of Judah!)

Because the primary proponents of BE are Jews and their message sounds, according to Himango, exclusionary and racist, it has the effect of fostering and engendering reverse antisemitism!!  It again tries to rebuild the wall that was torn down in Messiah and is again being demolished by brothers coming together to worship the God of Avraham, Itzaak and Ya’acov!

Oh that the jealousies and harassing of brothers would cease and we would all just focus on the Mashiach and His instructions!

Beware of theologies that would divide the Body of Messiah, contrary to clear teaching in Scripture.

Are there some things very special about Judah that we need to acknowledge?  Absolutely!!  Have the Christian followers of Messiah accomplished some things that Judah only dreamed of?  Yes!  Was it the plan of Mashiach to divide the bride for a time to safely convey her to her destination?  I believe so.  (See Ya’acov’s return to the land.)

As the Father brings the family back together, those in Messiah and keeping Torah, both Jew AND Gentile, need to be especially vigilant and willing to read Scripture and admit to generations of error.  We must guard against those fallacies the adversary would use to divide or break apart the one new man.  Love and acknowledge each for his contributions to the whole picture and be thankful that we have been given eyes to see beyond those of our fathers.

Let us not protect turfs, but seek common ground in shalom.

About Pete Rambo

Details in 'About' page @ Basically, husband of one, father of four. Pastor x 11 years, former business and military background. Micro-farmer. Messianic believer in Yeshua haMashiach!
This entry was posted in A Thought... and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Bilateral Ecclesiology. Antisemitism…. In Reverse?

  1. Peter, too, had issues with this type of elitism.
    Thanks for posting the quote from Judah Himango.
    I heard another viewpoint too about the dividing wall. It was a literal wall called the Coregh. A sign was posted on the outside: “No man of another nation to enter within the fence and enclosure round the temple, and whoever is caught will have himself to blame that his death ensues.”


  2. Teresa says:

    Does not matter which group we are affiliated with, both Jew and Gentile have to be grafted into the olive tree. Romans 11:21-24. And we are ALL adopted children. Romans 9:4 , Romans 8:15, Gal. 4:5 . Abba had only one begotten son.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Connie says:

    Read and left my reply on blogger Judah site. Said it all there.


    • Pete Rambo says:

      Went by to read it… Lots of comments, and truly some struggle with an understanding that we are all one in Messiah.

      Judah is one who totally ‘gets’ it and clearly stands unified with his brothers and sisters in Messiah, regardless of their physical genealogy. I enjoy stopping by his blog once or twice a week.



  4. Pete Rambo says:

    Here is an interesting related thread unfolding on another blog…

    If you read the thread by Judah Gabriel Himango, as well as the comments, linked IN my post, you will see that Gene was a major contributor and somewhat antagonist in the comments…

    The thread I just linked, unfolding now, is displaying so probable ‘fruits’ of Bilateral Ecclesiology. Read. Grieve. Be warned…

    Yeshua has ONE bride, ONE people and ONE Law. When we try to divide that, there is a price to pay… (I think that may be the early lesson in this.)


  5. Pingback: One Law = Erasing Jewish Distinctives? Baloney! | natsab

  6. Pingback: How to Divide a Family… A Thought. | natsab

  7. Pingback: Eclesiologia Bilateral. O Anti-Semitismo …. Em Reverso? | um só corpo, uma só fé

  8. Johnson, ann says:

    Being on the internet and having dealt with the ideas put forth by Messianics, it seems to me that the distinctions made between the circumcision and the uncircumcision are becoming wiped away in a specific area, our minds.
    What I mean is this. Paul teaches us that the circumcision is indebted to keep the whole law. We are also told that Gentiles die apart from the law, Jews are judged by the law. This notion seems to all but disappear when Messianic Gentiles ( and some Jews) engage in discussions with non messianics. So, when we read the Gospels, all of which were to the Jews, there is a tendency to read the Gospels as we are all the circumcision. they will quote scripture concerning the law not being destroyed, every jot and title etc. But certainly every jot and title is the whole law, of which Paul says the uncircumcision is judged apart from.apart from. So if the circumcision is Judged by the law (of Moses), then perhaps we need to be circumspect in how we read texts that has the circumcision for its message. Beginning maybe with John the Baptist. He preached the wrath to come and repent. Was it wrath that was by the law? Who refused John’s baptism? The very rulers to which Jesus called their traditions and commandments of men. These are they whom were the fathers of Rabbinic Judaism today. So, I think we need to know clearly and plainly what Messianics have learned from Rabbinics that they need to be a distinct ecclesia.


    • Adrian says:

      One will never clearly understand what Rabbi Sha’ul (Apostle Paul) taught without understanding the Hebraic mindset. Plain and simple, Paul taught Torah. So did Yeshua. In fact, they both died for it. Without going into the tremendous depth it would take to explain it all (a deep study is required) the fact is that both physical and heart circumcisions are required to this day. Father Yahweh’s Torah (instructions) have not changed as He does not change. Scripture teaches that Torah applies to all mankind. Yeshua himself said that the words He spoke were not His, but the Father’s. Yeshua was critical about the Pharisaical distortions of Torah and how the Jewish leadership elevated the Talmudic rulings over Torah making hypocrites of themselves and impossible for anyone to bear. The mainstream Christianity we know today has its origins and its doctrines deeply rooted in Roman Catholicism, which begun to separate itself for Judaism in its early history. Catholicism blended Messianism sect of Judaism that Yeshua and the apostles taught and the the pagan practices prevalent in Roman-Greco culture. The Catholic church was eager to remove itself from anything that looked Jewish and the Jews were happy to see them go. The Protestant Reformation, in an attempt to remove itself from Rome and get back to Biblical truth, did not go back far enough. Ultimately, even Martin Luther himself wanted nothing to do with the Jews. Sigh, just too much to try and put into this little box. Keep seeking Truth, you will find it! Shalom, Adrian

      Liked by 1 person

Please Share Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s